Dear residents of Wellington.
I know these things are a pest, but I really don’t want a flyover to walk/bike under on my way to town. I think it would be depressing. Better options are around, and NZTA will consider them if enough of the public say that’s what they want. So please send a letter to email@example.com. (Before Friday, 26 August 2011) Here’s a proforma;
Re: Cobham Drive to Buckle Street Transport Improvements – Community Engagement – July to August 2011
I support neither of the proposals currently put forward for public consultation by the NZTA for improvements to the Basin Reserve area. I would like the options for consultation to be broadened to include the NZTA report’s Option F and Architecture Centre’s Option X.
For more information about Option F;
For more information about Option X;
The Architecture Centre is leading the campaign for option x. This is the important stuff that cities are made of, have your say.
“The NZTA have proposed options for redeveloping the roading of the Basin Reserve. But these are not really options. They are two schemes for flyovers which have very little difference. We believe that the scheme/s proposed by NZTA exclude the public from making a real choice.
Currently the Basin is a mess. From a multi-modal perspective (pedestrian, cyclist, car) the Basin is not a safe place. Aesthetically it is a dog. The inward facing cricket ground alienates its surroundings. Recent building has reneged on its public responsibilities, creating some of the worst public street faces of architecture in Wellington.
We have no doubt that something needs to be done, but the choices to be made are at least on two levels.
1) Should the remediation work to improve the urban design of the Basin assume traffic levels will increase or not? and how should it respond to consequent changes in local conditions? Data from the NZTA website suggest traffic levels have been plateauing for quite some time.
2) Should the remediation work use a tunnel or a flyover?
We think grade separation is critical to ensure better safety to all road users, and to help achieve speed consistency of motor vehicles, which will reduce emissions and noise pollution. Both tunnels and flyovers have their problems for designers. The scale of such infrastructure must respect the scale of the urban or suburban fabric it sits within. Both can cause issues of severance or undesirable residual spaces. We recognise that the NZTA images of the flyovers presented to the public do not reflect the potential design quality of the flyover structures, as these are yet to be properly designed.
Both flyovers and tunnel entrances can be poetic, elegant, and inspiring design. Both will cost money to get the design right, and to guarantee that Wellingtonians end up with a Basin Reserve that we are proud of.”